Lloyd George also intended to maintain a balance of European powers to thwart a French attempt to establish itself as a dominant European power. A revitalized Germany would be a counterweight to France and a deterrent to Bolshevik Russia. Lloyd George also wanted to neutralize the German navy to retain the Royal Navy as the world`s largest maritime power; Decomposing the German colonial empire with several of its territorial possessions to Britain and others that were established as mandates of the League of Nations, a position rejected by the Dominions.  The Weimar government also funded undercover domestic rearmament programs disguised as “X-budgets,” up to 10% of the disclosed military budget.  In 1925, German companies began building tanks and modern artillery. During the year, more than half of China`s arms imports were worth 13 million German marks and 13 million German marks. In January 1927, after the withdrawal of the Allied Disarmament Committee, Krupps accelerated the production of tanks and artillery.   [vii] Production increased, so that until 1937 military exports had increased to 82,788,604 Reichsmark.   Production was not the only injury: “volunteers” were quickly led by the army to form a pool of trained reserves, and paramilitary organizations were encouraged by illegally militarized police. The non-commissioned officers (non-commissioned officers) were not limited by the treaty, so this loophole was exploited and, as such, the number of non-commissioned officers was much higher than the number required by the Reichswehr.  The treaty aroused much discontent in Germany, which benefited Adolf Hitler in his rise to the leadership of Nazi Germany. The emphasis was on the belief in the myth that the German army had not lost the war and had been betrayed by the Weimar Republic, which was negotiating an unnecessary surrender. The Great Depression aggravated the problem and led to the collapse of the German economy.
Although the contract may not have caused the crash, it was a convenient scapegoat. The Germans regarded the treaty as a humiliation and listened eagerly to Hitler`s oratory, which held the treaty responsible for the abuses in Germany. Hitler promised to reverse the cauterizations of the Allied powers and regain Germany`s lost territory and pride, which led the treaty to be invoked as the cause of World War II.   As in Europe, the Middle East has been divided by a series of agreements reached at peace conferences. Unlike Europe, these divisions were largely the result of agreements already concluded during the war. The German historian Detlev Peukert wrote that Versailles was far from the impossible peace that most Germans claimed in the interwar period, and that it was not without flaws, it was actually quite reasonable for Germany.  Peukert argued instead that in Germany it was widely assumed that Versailles was a totally unreasonable treaty, and that it was this “perception” rather than the “reality” of the Treaty of Versailles that mattered.  Peukert noted that because of the “thousand-year hopes” that had arisen in Germany during the First World War, when it appeared for a time that Germany was about to conquer all of Europe, any peace treaty imposed by the Allies of the First World War on the defeated German Empire would inevitably provoke a nationalist reaction and there was nothing that the Allies could have done to avoid this reaction.  Peukert realized this by observing that Gustav Stresemann`s policy of rapprochement with Western powers between 1923 and 1929 was a constructive policy that could have allowed Germany to play a more positive role in Europe and that it was not true that German democracy had been condemned to death for Versailles in 1919.  Finally, Peukert argued that it was the Great Depression and the turning point towards a nationalist policy of self-sufficiency in Germany at the same time that ended the Weimar Republic, not the Treaty of Versaille.  In 2010, ninety years after the